Reading time: 4 minutes
This is the second of two posts with ideas for developing understanding of ‘implicature’ (discussed in a previous research digest on ‘Implicature and literary texts’ ).
These activities apply the notion of implicature in analysing texts and understanding some of their effects. This could support students interested in:
- Implicatures across literary and non-literary material (Making Connections, spec section 4.3).
- Exploring interaction (Exploring Conflict, spec section 4.2).
First: identifying and exploring implicatures in texts
Ask students to look at any text and identify some of its implicatures.
They should also make a note of thoughts which might be about implicatures, but which they are not sure of. These will be a basis for later discussion.
Students begin working individually and then work in pairs or small groups to compare answers. Comparing notes will almost always lead individual students to have new thoughts about the text.
- Find a text or use a set one from Exploring Conflict (spec section 4.2) and make a note of as many possible implicatures of the text as you can.
- Compare your list with other students, considering each possible implicature and commenting to what extent you are sure it is an implicature.
- Try to sort the implicatures into types: which ones are stronger? which ones are weaker? Which ones leave you unsure about whether or not they were intended?
- Consider who might be intending to communicate each of these implicatures:
- is it the author of the text?
- a narrator?
- somebody else?
- are there any you are not sure about?
- Now focus on one fairly strong implicature of the text. Suggest further lines of reasoning so that you might derive a wider range of weaker implicatures starting from it.
- Discussion: “to what extent do you think what you have been doing contributes to (or counts as) developing a fuller interpretation of the text?”
Then: comparing texts
Following on from the previous task, this compares texts and how many stronger or weaker implicatures they give rise to.
Any texts could be compared, but one idea would be to start with two texts, including one which clearly gives rise to a wider range of weaker implicatures. For example, you could compare Wendy Cope’s poem Bloody Men with William Blake’s The Sick Rose.
Students can repeat this activity to explore further texts, or compare two parts of the same text. Consider the ‘gun’ simile at the beginning of Seamus Heaney’s Digging and the ‘dig’ metaphor at the end. This example is discussed in a previous digest post, ‘Implicatures and literary texts’.
- Select your texts.
- List some strong implicatures of each text.
- List some weaker implicatures of each text.
- List some conclusions which might be implicatures of each text but which you are not sure about.
- Now compare the two texts to consider: which one has a greater number of stronger implicatures and which one more weaker one?
- Discussion: “what does this suggest about the two texts?”
This task develops understanding by intervention, i.e. by rewriting texts to give rise to more or fewer stronger and weaker implicatures. This can support students thinking about their own re-writing as part of Writing About Society (spec section 4.2.2).
- Revisit a text from the previous task.
- Make a note of some strong implicatures of this text.
- Make a note of some weaker implicatures.
- Comment on your overall impression of the text with regard to how many stronger and how many weaker implicatures it suggests.
- Now rewrite some passages to change the status of particular assumptions, i.e. either to make some weaker implicatures stronger or to make some stronger implicatures weaker.
- Look at a different text and compare it with the one you have been working on.
- Suggest some rewrites to one or both texts to make them more like each other.
- Discussion: “what does this suggest about the texts you have been looking at?”
Applying These Ideas to NEA
A student who has worked through these will have developed their understanding of implicatures and how they can vary across texts. They will also have developed their understanding of how to create and edit texts while thinking about the implicatures they are likely to generate. This can be useful for the NEA, and help students generate their own data for comparison with their chosen literary text.